What does the Emerging Church really want?

September 24th, 2006 | Christianity, Wholehearted | Syndicate Content

My definition of the Emerging Church is a group of people within the church or without that are wanting to come out of the current mold and trend to become something different that connects them with God in a deeper more passionate way.

I knew I wanted to go into ministry but after two semesters as a Youth Ministry Major I realized that Bible school wasn’t going to give me the answers I needed. Most of my classes were about how to grow my youth group and how to put on a summer camp, but none taught me how to baptize a new believer in the Holy Spirit or how to lead daily prayer meetings or how to get out of my sin and live a mature Christian life.

Five years ago I left Bible School and I moved somewhere that I felt would have answers for me as a man looking to live an effective Godly life. There are many more like me who are calling out asking for relevance and freshness in their life. They want something different than what they are currently getting.

What has created this emerging culture of people?
I think the reason there is a cry coming out within the church today for something different is because of the leadership over the past 80-90 years. There has been a decline in the preaching of the word and the importance of prayer in the Church.

D. Matyn Lloyd-Jones says that preaching has declined because

…sermons were replaced by ethical addresses and homilies, and moral uplift and socio-political talk… [also] the form became more important than the substance, the oratory and the eloquence became things in and of themselves, and ultimately preaching became a form of entertainment.

I have spoken with so many people who have said that their pastor preaches good sermons but they’re not challenging them. They’re not being led into deep things of the Word. People are being entertained instead of led from the pulpit.

What does the Emerging Church really want?
I think most leaders within the emerging church are answering the cry of this movement in the wrong way.

Most churches I have visited or heard about that are claiming to be a part of the emerging church, or most bloggers and writers that I read that claim to be a part of the emerging church are doing things wrong and even un-Biblically. One of the dominant focuses of how to do church the ‘emerging church way’ is to stress the visual and performing arts, music, interaction with the local culture, and to not ignore the influence of pop culture.

What has happened is that many of these emerging churches have become seeker friendly. They are trying to make it as easy as possible for the most messed up, stuck sinners to come to church but nobody ever gets out of their mess. They stay stuck and the preacher makes excuses for them as to why it’s o.k. In fact, often the Bible is even taught as only one of the ways to god; many leaders in the emerging church say the Bible is too constricting and they actually promote interspirituality.

I’ve read magazines that claim to be relevant to the emerging church but all they seem to do is talk about what “R” rated movies are good and what secular music is cool. Do the young people of this nation really need an excuse to “eat more chocolate cake“? Do they really need someone telling them that it’s good to have balance? I think they are already doing plenty of that without anyone’s encouragement. A little nudge in that direction just might push them over the edge. Not to mention what most would call ‘balance’ and ‘relevance’ is actually sin.

The emerging church does not need flash and hype to enjoy God. They don’t need liberties and leeway and ‘grace’ in their lifestyle. They don’t need a reduced, laymen’s translation of the Bible. I have talked to people that are being led by these leaders, and they’re not saying, “yeah, I finally broke out of my boring church into a Godly community that has cool graphic design brochures every Sunday and well produced movies as the announcements and I feel good about drinking with my friends.” They say “I need something more real and raw from the Word of God. I need something deeper and more radical. I need a life in God.” They’re saying that they want something that will cost them.

I am positive that what the emerging church wants and needs is to live a holy passionate life before God.

  • They want us to lead the way into holiness and maturity and a fasted lifestyle.
  • They want the plain Word of the Lord and Bible teaching without apology and reductionism.
  • They want prayer meetings and Bible studies.
  • They want to get a real baptism in the Spirit and to live an apostolic lifestyle.
  • They want excuses and leadership to go hard after God.

The greatest way we can lead is by living the life ourselves and continuing to point people to the Word of God and to Christ by prophesying with our words and actions. In the words of my good friend Corey, we need to shut it all down and pray. We need God. We contend for the fullness of God’s promises not only in intercession but by living the lifestyle today that we want and need to live in the days to come.

U P D A T E : A respected minister gave a comment that by and large the churches they work with do not lack an emphasis on Scripture nor do they teach an ‘all roads lead to God’ theology.

My emphasis in this article is not to bash the emerging church but to give a statement of what I have seen and encountered in many (not all) places, and to call us all to a place of loving Christ and leading others to do the same.

5 Comments »

  1. eric said:

    Be a voice in the wilderness, shout it from the house top. Awesome

    Posted on September 25, 2006 at 7:47 am

  2. Sean said:

    great writing!

    Posted on September 25, 2006 at 9:40 am

  3. Stephanie said:

    Shawn- Very well put. I have several friends in San Francisco who are buying into the emerging church movement. They are into intellectual discussion about how religion isn’t cutting it and philosophizing about culture, but they never seem to talk about Jesus. I was going to a cell group with these people and always left frustrated because we never really prayer or talked about the Bible. Now I realize why, the movement is straying from anything “traditional”, which includes the most important pieces of our faith.

    Posted on September 25, 2006 at 9:45 am

  4. Shawn said:

    Thanks you guys. I”ve gotten a lot of postitive feedback from this post. I think it’s because there really is truth to it. We all want to be called to something higher than where we’re at now. The trouble is that when answer that call are we truly responding in a way that heaven considers faithful followthrough?

    I’ve really been challenged lately by my own lifestyle and the choices I’m making and the way I’m spending my time. I want to sow into eternal things.

    Posted on September 26, 2006 at 11:48 pm

  5. teresa said:

    hi shawn-
    i know- old post to respond to. i’ve been an off and on ghost reader since awhile back. i’m an austin gal who’s moved to kc- one of the ones that helped host you folks when you came down for a one thing. anyhow- i came to your site and was actually looking for those great resources on time management you used to have, including the youtube video with the guy writing breaking up his day with email and water and crunches? …not there…

    so in my archive search, i found this post. it caught my eye because i’m one of those person who floats around multiple parts of the body to connect it and communicate across difference to help hold the body together- much like myofacial tissue.

    and, i have to admit- much of what you wrote over a year ago is applicable to what is now “branded” as the emerging church. in fact, it’s disgusting to me how far away from the original idea it has become. it’s become a bunch of cool people growing gotees, buying relevant and justifying living compromised lives and choices.

    but being someone who has found a spiritual family among “emerging” types… i have to say- that the original intent has gone a bit awry. it’s not just about candles and couches and bitter sarcasm, but it is an attempt to take away to pretenses of church. to take away to superstar pastor-driven roman way of teaching the word- but bringing it down to a more socratic communal journey of experiencing truth in life and discovery. i cannot begin to retell how my spiritual tribe came to be and how it completely changed my life, but it’s definitely not for the seekers or new believers. all of us (my tribe) are seasoned believers who have eaten and still feast in the word and are incarnationally working it out. i’ve never literally lived acts quite like i have with anyone else. it would be the closest thing to living the jesus people movement in the 2000’s. and it’s rich. the creativity is an overflow- and not an aesthetic overlay to bring up warm fuzzy feelings. we’re all artists- and the creative worship that comes about is truly authentic and is an offering and draws us deeper into worship and revelation. it’s breaking out of a fundamentalist mindset that trashes anything outside of someone’s statement of belief. as my good friend said, “it’s about looking at the years of history in terms of layers in photoshop. and looking down the x axis from a z perspective and adjusting the opacity and placement of each layer to honor the church and bring together a fuller and more true picture of god, the church and worship.” and the prophetic and apostolic truly partner in ways i’ve never seen in other parts of the church. i pray and fast with and for these people i share life with no less intently than those in ihop.

    so anyways- i agree with your analysis of the pop-culture of the emergent types. in fact, i don’t really associate with that. it’s unfortunately become a denomination or a brand — much like vineyard became a brand or denomination. but the true heart of the emerging types live radically for god, but live in the margins of church. but in no way are we compromising the word or living unholy/less holy lives.

    i think you’d really dig the true emerging ones.

    Posted on January 3, 2008 at 11:39 am

Dem's fightin' words...